The Hub — MYP Design Tech
⚠ Demo Mode — sample data only
🔧
The Hub
MYP Design Tech — CIS Hefei
87 students
6 sections
G6A 14 G6B 15 G7A 16 G7B 15 G8A 14 G9A 13
Today's Schedule — Thu Oct 8
08:10 G6A Brainstorming: Ergonomic Pencil Case
09:05 G7A Prototyping: Wood Joint Workshop
10:20 G8A Evaluating: Product Testing & Feedback NOW
11:15 G9A Creating: Final Assembly — Sustainable Lamp
13:00 G6B Investigating: Material Properties
14:00 G7B Developing Ideas: Iterative Sketching
Curriculum Progress
G6 Everyday Problem Solvers
Wk 6 / 8 — 75%
G7 Nature-Inspired Structures
Wk 6 / 9 — 67%
G8 Product Deconstruction & Redesign
Wk 7 / 7 — 100%
G9 Sustainable Design Challenge
Wk 7 / 10 — 70%
Needs Attention
Noah Kim
Overall 4.0 · G8A — below target
Luca Ferreira
Overall 2.0 · G7B — below threshold
Aiko Tanaka
Missing Crit B, C · Nature-Inspired Structures · G7A
Omar Khalil
Missing Crit C, D · Product Deconstruction · G8A
Sofia Patel
Missing Crit A · Everyday Problem Solvers · G6B
To-Do
Upload G9 assessment rubric to ManageBac
Order 2mm balsa sheets for G7 structures unit
Email parents re: maker space field trip
Finalize G8 product testing criteria
Book woodshop induction for new G6 students
Student Roster
G6A — Grade 6, Section A 14 students
First NameLast NameNationality
G6B — Grade 6, Section B 15 students
First NameLast NameNationality
G7A — Grade 7, Section A 16 students
First NameLast NameNationality
G7B — Grade 7, Section B 15 students
First NameLast NameNationality
G8A — Grade 8, Section A 14 students
First NameLast NameNationality
G9A — Grade 9, Section A 13 students
First NameLast NameNationality
Curriculum Planner — 2026–27
Lesson Plans
Week of Oct 6–10, 2026
⚠ Demo — read-only view. All fields are disabled.
Section Day 1 — Mon/Tue Day 2 — Wed/Thu Unit Criteria D1 Status D2 Status
G6A Everyday Problem Solvers
AB
Done In Progress
G6B Everyday Problem Solvers
AB
Done Done
G7A Nature-Inspired Structures
BC
In Progress —
G7B Nature-Inspired Structures
BC
Done In Progress
G8A Product Deconstruction
CD
In Progress —
G9A Sustainable Design Challenge
CD
Done In Progress
Gradebook
⚠ Demo — scores are read-only sample data. G8A shown with full data; other sections show placeholder.
G6A 5.2
G6B 5.4
G7A 5.8
G7B 5.1
G8A 5.6
G9A 6.1
Unit: Product Deconstruction & Redesign — Criteria A B C D
Student Crit A Crit B Crit C Crit D Overall
Noah Kim45344.0
Maya Johansson67666.3
Aiden Zhang76776.8
Chloe Brennan55655.3
Omar Khalil34——3.5
Julia Schneider77766.8
Ren Fujimoto65665.8
Isabelle Laurent76776.8
Jackson Moore44544.3
Sakura Ito67676.5
Erik Lindberg56555.3
Zoe Patel77777.0
Max Fischer45444.3
Leila Ahmadi66666.0
Section Average 5.6 5.7 5.6 5.6 5.6
AI-Generated Report Comments — G8A
MYP Design Technology · Product Deconstruction & Redesign · Report Period 1
In the live Hub, comments are generated via OpenAI and can be edited, copied to ManageBac,
and compiled per report period. Comments below are pre-generated sample outputs.
Noah Kim
G8A · Overall 4.0 · Crit A: 4 / B: 5 / C: 3 / D: 4
Noah demonstrates a developing understanding of design thinking processes. He engages thoughtfully during investigation phases but would benefit from more detailed documentation of his design decisions. His final product showed creativity, and with stronger criterion-based evidence, his grades will reflect his evident capabilities.
Zoe Patel
G8A · Overall 7.0 · Crit A: 7 / B: 7 / C: 7 / D: 7
Zoe consistently produces outstanding work across all four MYP criteria. Her investigation is thorough and well-documented, her design ideas are creative and clearly justified, and her final products demonstrate excellent craftsmanship. A pleasure to work with in the workshop.
Jackson Moore
G8A · Overall 4.3 · Crit A: 4 / B: 4 / C: 5 / D: 4
Jackson is a capable designer who brings enthusiasm to making tasks. His investigation phase is solid, though his design journal could better reflect the iterative process. Encouraging him to photograph and annotate each prototype stage will strengthen his Criterion C and D evidence considerably.
Weekly Newsletter
Week of Oct 6–10, 2026
Grade 6
2
posts this term
Grade 7
2
posts this term
Grade 8
3
this week ✓
Grade 9
2
posts this term
Grade 8 Design Tech — Week of Oct 6–10
✓ This week: posted
This week in Grade 8 Design Tech, students completed their product evaluation phase for the Deconstruction & Redesign unit. Highlights included some remarkable user-testing sessions where students invited Grade 5 buddies to try their redesigned products and give honest feedback. Watching students iterate based on real user input was a genuine classroom highlight!
Sent to: G8A parent mailing list · 14 recipients

Tracker — week of Oct 6, 2026

This week's classes, at a glance
📁
Resources — Coming Soon
This section will house shared rubrics, unit resources, and student handouts linked to the curriculum. Files will be searchable by grade, unit, and MYP criteria.